President Obama began his reign as the hope of the civil liberties movement, but he ends a four-year term with a worse record than the President Bush he followed. Obama's remorseless assault on basic rights in America, Bernard Keane says, sets the tone for continuing loss of liberties and freedoms in Australia and globally as drone kills, loss of free speech and mass surveillance become 'normalised'.
In a major annual review of FOI in Australia, Dr Johan Lidberg says we're suffering from a two-speed approach with more than half the jurisdictions lagging. He points out the nation ranks as a middling muddler in how information publicly gathered and paid for is made available to the citizens who really own it – all of it, not just the bits the bureaucrats and pollies want released to suit their own spin.
Politicians don't take mandatory declarations of their interests seriously, says Prof Ross Fitzgerald. In virtually all cases, the lists involve tokenism and hide as much as they reveal, certainly about the entire family's asset base. As well, the lists are largely silent on key issues like faith-based memberships, which may sway important votes on marriage, charity status, aid donations and the like.
Mark Summerfield, a patent attorney, analyses the current UK alleged piracy/copyright extradition case with major international ramifications. As well, there's links to the NYT coverage of proposed new US laws which are even more draconian, and to an SMH story of the real-life experience of an Australian extradited and jailed in the US for a similar 'offence'.
Fringe-dwelling firms are finding sneaky ways to exploit government agreements to milk them for private data never envisaged when the deal was originally done. In the West, you park at your peril, because the government willy-nilly hands over your private address details – despite previously saying the information was 'off limits'
A new global rating, which ranks how open access to information is within a country, places Australia in the middle, FOI expert Dr Johan Lidberg (pictured) says. We'll know more about really how free and easy information is here, if it is, when Dr Lidberg's new national survey is completed next year.
Should Australians have the right to be forgotten online? We want your opinion.
There’s an emerging debate over what data we store, how we store it, who can access it and how widely it can be searched and promulgated.
CLA closely scrutinizes government action which infringes the general right to be left alone. If this right is to be infringed, and the Government demand we hand over personal information, we expect the benefits to outweigh the cost and inconvenience. We also expect our private information to be kept just that: private. Sadly businesses and governments often just collect information for its own sake, and then fail to protect it. They treat it as a commodity to be sold or traded. How does the Census stand up?
The open access that the UK's Independent Reviewer of terrorism laws, David Anderson, has to secret agencies "reflects the importance which our democracy attaches to rigorous independent scrutiny of the many exceptional powers given to authorities to deal with the threat of terrorism," he says in his just-released report. It will be interesting to compare the UK report with that of Bret Walker, also a QC, who was appointed earlier this year to the same oversight role in Australia.
'The cause for which we stand and when we must, fight, is freedom,' says Malcolm Turnbull in a thoughtful analysis of effects from the WikiLeaks/Assange matters. He also points out that the High Court in Australia is unlikely to protect the secrets of a foreign government or confidential political information, even if the government wants it to.
Harmless-sounding international conventions are the latest favoured way for governments to sign away individual liberties, and allow international spying on private data. Anti-rights 'crimes' are increasingly being committed by our politicians in the name of "anti-terror" laws and measures. Adam Brereton has the low down on high-sounding skulduggery.
Rather than pillory Julian Assange, and 'shop' him to the US Administration to meet whatever fate, the Gillard government should stand up for him...and for the world's right to free speech, even if honesty and transparency doesn't suit the Americans, CLA member Jim Collier (photo) told a rally in Launceston. (Youtube video included in the full article)
Wouldn’t it be good if, on Australia Day, PM Julia Gillard spoke out in support of the right to freedom of speech of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks? If she spoke up, it would prove the accuracy of Michael’s Parkinson’s Australia Day comment that he had seen “Australia shrug off an inferiority complex”. CLA's Australia Day letter to the PM
Be afraid, be very afraid!. That's how the US Government and, by extension, the Australian Government wants you to be in relation to Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. Salon's Glenn Greenwald reveals a long-running government strategy of intimidation, which is what should truly be feared in a democracy.
The USA's proposed new 'Shield Bill', aimed at thwarting WikiLeaks, would would be likely to constrain public servants only, due to First Amendment protections, according to U. Chicago Law Professor Geoffrey Stone.
::Next >>
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | © Civil Liberties Australia A04043 - ABN 46 368 619 567 |