Privacy is an inherent right, under international and Australian law. No one should suffer arbitrary or unlawful interference to person, possessions, information or correspondence, nor attacks on honour or reputation.
President Obama began his reign as the hope of the civil liberties movement, but he ends a four-year term with a worse record than the President Bush he followed. Obama's remorseless assault on basic rights in America, Bernard Keane says, sets the tone for continuing loss of liberties and freedoms in Australia and globally as drone kills, loss of free speech and mass surveillance become 'normalised'.
As Australia readies for new see-through – and mandatory – airport scanners from 1 July, international security guru Bruce Schneier has put the entire issue of "security theatre" in context with some apt examples. He explains that national transport authorities are actually doing the terrorists' work for them.
A Senate Committee is inquiring into proposed mandatory see-through scanners at airports from 1 July but doesn't have all the information it needs, CLA says. CLA is calling for a standards-based security risk assessment, an obligatory step under government protocols, which may or may not have been done for the controversial new devices.
Politicians don't take mandatory declarations of their interests seriously, says Prof Ross Fitzgerald. In virtually all cases, the lists involve tokenism and hide as much as they reveal, certainly about the entire family's asset base. As well, the lists are largely silent on key issues like faith-based memberships, which may sway important votes on marriage, charity status, aid donations and the like.
Mandatory, see-through, airport scanners ride roughshod over our civil liberties, CLA says in its submission to the Senate Committee set up to rubber stamp the proposal. The federal government is hell-bent on forcing us to go through the revealing scanners, without an alternative pat-down procedure, from 1 July 2012...even though two of the world's most security-conscious nations, Israel and Germany, have actively rejected them, as CLA's video on the proposal demonstrates.
Read CLA submission » ...
Other submissions to the Inquiry » ...
CLA video » ...
Plans to introduce see-through scanners at airports don’t allow you any choice, like frisking or pat-down as alternatives. The scanners are bad in principle, will cause delays and produce false positives, and they create a head-on assault on Australians’ civil liberties. They are also a waste of taxpayers’ money, hundreds of millions of dollars of it – you can email/SMS/Tweet the Minister with your thoughts (details are on screen in the video). If you like, you can join CLA or donate so we can continue this campaign and others to help protect Australians’ rights and freedoms - click here.
Click here for the Freedom Has Flown video telling the real story of what’s wrong with Australia’s proposed airport scanners.
CLA has received many requests over the past few months for information about people's civil liberties and rights in relation to surveys by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The ABS is becoming more like Big Brother in its approach, it seems, in two major surveys currently under way into Health, and Financial/Utilities. Here's a report of a recent interview...
The see-through body scanners announced for Australia have already been proven to not work in cases like the "underpants bomber" – the supposed reason for their introduction – writes John P Harvey. As well there are major scientific concerns about radiation emitted by the scanners, he says, providing extensive references you can check out.
A good percentage of the opposition to see-through airport body scanners highlights the possible dangers of radiation. Here's an opinion piece which lists some references...plus a video at the end which pokes fun at the American Transport Safety Authority, the TSA.
The announcement that full body scanners will be used at Australian airports is drawing flak from many quarters. It is particularly galling, CLA says, that the Australian Government won't allow "opt out" alternative procedures, as occurs in Europe and the USA. This amounts to 'digital strip searching', CLA Director and media spokesperson, Tim Vines, says.
Mark Summerfield, a patent attorney, analyses the current UK alleged piracy/copyright extradition case with major international ramifications. As well, there's links to the NYT coverage of proposed new US laws which are even more draconian, and to an SMH story of the real-life experience of an Australian extradited and jailed in the US for a similar 'offence'.
Information Commissioner Prof John McMillan has agreed to highlight the risks surrounding biometric technology to both government and the private sector in future. His positive response follows a campaign by Civil Liberties Australia, the Australian Privacy Foundation and others over many months to raise appropriate awareness among those choosing security systems.
The Father of Freer Information in Australia, Senator John Faulkner, has given his creation – the Office of the Information Commissioner – a tick for achievements in its first 12 months. But he has reminded the Information, Privacy and FOI Commissioners that the big battles are still ahead, and that government information is a national resource.
As each week passes, slick salespeople flog new "miracle" surveillance cameras. Here, a report indicates national chain stores are installing devices that analyse shoppers emotions, pick their gender, guess their age, deduce their mood. As CLA's National Media Director, Tim Vines, points out, shops infringe people's privacy if a person's image is used for a purpose they are not aware of.
The resignation of Ombudsman Allan Asher, pressured by the Executive Government, highlights the need for greater independence of the office, and a return to proper funding. John Wood – himself a former Deputy Ombudsman, and now consultant to Pacific states on the role – relates the history and urges taking the vital next step in protecting such an important citizens' advocate.
::Next >>
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | © Civil Liberties Australia A04043 - ABN 46 368 619 567 |