Privacy is an inherent right, under international and Australian law. No one should suffer arbitrary or unlawful interference to person, possessions, information or correspondence, nor attacks on honour or reputation.
Mark Summerfield, a patent attorney, analyses the current UK alleged piracy/copyright extradition case with major international ramifications. As well, there's links to the NYT coverage of proposed new US laws which are even more draconian, and to an SMH story of the real-life experience of an Australian extradited and jailed in the US for a similar 'offence'.
Information Commissioner Prof John McMillan has agreed to highlight the risks surrounding biometric technology to both government and the private sector in future. His positive response follows a campaign by Civil Liberties Australia, the Australian Privacy Foundation and others over many months to raise appropriate awareness among those choosing security systems.
The Father of Freer Information in Australia, Senator John Faulkner, has given his creation – the Office of the Information Commissioner – a tick for achievements in its first 12 months. But he has reminded the Information, Privacy and FOI Commissioners that the big battles are still ahead, and that government information is a national resource.
As each week passes, slick salespeople flog new "miracle" surveillance cameras. Here, a report indicates national chain stores are installing devices that analyse shoppers emotions, pick their gender, guess their age, deduce their mood. As CLA's National Media Director, Tim Vines, points out, shops infringe people's privacy if a person's image is used for a purpose they are not aware of.
The resignation of Ombudsman Allan Asher, pressured by the Executive Government, highlights the need for greater independence of the office, and a return to proper funding. John Wood – himself a former Deputy Ombudsman, and now consultant to Pacific states on the role – relates the history and urges taking the vital next step in protecting such an important citizens' advocate.
The federal government has created another secret database where people merely "suspected" of arson will be tagged and flagged, to be hounded throughout summer if as much as a match strikes in their suburb. CLA is concerned that 'mates' will put mates' names down as a prank, neighbours in dispute will add the name of someone they don't like to the database: the traditional right of "innocent until proven guilty" is being trashed by governments in Australia.
Phone data access being used to enforce fines
Police and crime agencies tapped people's phones and electronic equipment at the rate of about 10 a day last year – 3488 warrants were issued – while nearly 600 surveillance devices (10 a week) went into operation around Australia. Surveillance is on the rise, and privileged access to phone data is also increasingly being used for mundane activities such as collecting council fines and enforcing the dog act, via RSPCAs.
Health Minister Nicola Roxon has lashed out at privacy and civil liberties people, calling them "obsessive" about the risk of private health records of Australians being mislaid, stolen or inadvertently posted online for anyone to access. However, the advocates can point to real-life examples of health record systems gone pear-shaped, including another major stuff-up involving 20,000 patients at a prestigious US hospital revealed this week.
Search engines like Google and social media like Facebook are increasingly giving up people's private, personal data to police and spook agencies who demand it...as well as themselves 'mining' it for commercial advantage. We are becoming less an individual and more a cipher, but new products may emerge to allow people to choose greater privacy.
Why should innocent drivers have photos of their vehicles kept for 30 days, CLA asks, as the ACT Government is about to introduce a new speed detection system? Keep the photos of those exceeding the speed limit, by all means, but why should innocent people, obeying the speed limit, have images kept for 30 days? Technology should be used to delete photos of the innocent within hours, CLA says.
Should Australians have the right to be forgotten online? We want your opinion.
There’s an emerging debate over what data we store, how we store it, who can access it and how widely it can be searched and promulgated.
Australia is moving closer to the old, discredited idea of the Australia Card, one ID number for each Aussie. The Health Department plans to link all your doctor-medicine-hospital information from July 2012. Police and security authorities have your number (and your email address), and are increasingly centralising data. Here's how the American civil liberties body sees the future...
Click for pizza ordering »...
The planned new personal health identifier – one number supposedly to identify you for all health purposes – is a disaster waiting to happen, the Australian Privacy Foundation indicates in a submission. APF, with CLA help, identified that the system makes extra work for doctors, is missing a proper governance framework, bends or breaks the reasons Parliament passed new law, and ignores vital safeguards around DNA sampling and storage.
Read the APF submission »...
Canada is about to suffer the indignity of private conversations being recorded for police and security use, Tim Lash writes. He appeals for international help to stop the spread of citizen surveillance by the state...but it's too late for Australia.
Are our spook agencies performing well, a review asks? Given their excessive secrecy, how can we know, CLA responds, and points out the danger to society if the massive staff and budget increases of the past decade are leading to 'make-work' spying on innocent Australians.
Read submission »...
::Next >>
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | © Civil Liberties Australia A04043 - ABN 46 368 619 567 |