President Obama began his reign as the hope of the civil liberties movement, but he ends a four-year term with a worse record than the President Bush he followed. Obama's remorseless assault on basic rights in America, Bernard Keane says, sets the tone for continuing loss of liberties and freedoms in Australia and globally as drone kills, loss of free speech and mass surveillance become 'normalised'.
Do you think Australians have less freedom, less democracy, than 10 years ago when the planes crashed into New York's Twin Towers? Have terrorists changed the way Australians live? PM Julia Gillard said those questions were how we should test our decade-long, multi-billion response to terrorism. CLA asked the PM to set up a public inquiry to get the answers to her own questions...but she has declined to do so. They're important questions: what do you think?
As Australia readies for new see-through – and mandatory – airport scanners from 1 July, international security guru Bruce Schneier has put the entire issue of "security theatre" in context with some apt examples. He explains that national transport authorities are actually doing the terrorists' work for them.
A Senate Committee is inquiring into proposed mandatory see-through scanners at airports from 1 July but doesn't have all the information it needs, CLA says. CLA is calling for a standards-based security risk assessment, an obligatory step under government protocols, which may or may not have been done for the controversial new devices.
Anti-terorrism laws, it seems, worry government more in prospect than reality. Passed in haste, with assurances about reviews later, these abusive laws have received no scrutiny as promised. Now even the idea of review has slipped into limbo, off the COAG agenda, Bernard Keane reports.
Mandatory, see-through, airport scanners ride roughshod over our civil liberties, CLA says in its submission to the Senate Committee set up to rubber stamp the proposal. The federal government is hell-bent on forcing us to go through the revealing scanners, without an alternative pat-down procedure, from 1 July 2012...even though two of the world's most security-conscious nations, Israel and Germany, have actively rejected them, as CLA's video on the proposal demonstrates.
Read CLA submission » ...
Other submissions to the Inquiry » ...
CLA video » ...
Plans to introduce see-through scanners at airports don’t allow you any choice, like frisking or pat-down as alternatives. The scanners are bad in principle, will cause delays and produce false positives, and they create a head-on assault on Australians’ civil liberties. They are also a waste of taxpayers’ money, hundreds of millions of dollars of it – you can email/SMS/Tweet the Minister with your thoughts (details are on screen in the video). If you like, you can join CLA or donate so we can continue this campaign and others to help protect Australians’ rights and freedoms - click here.
Click here for the Freedom Has Flown video telling the real story of what’s wrong with Australia’s proposed airport scanners.
The Australian Government's proposed National Human Rights Action Plan has some significant shortcomings, the author of CLA's submission on the plan, Rhys Michie, said. The "national" plan lacks contributions from NSW, Qld, SA, WA, Tas and the ACT; it downplays the role of human rights in counter-terrorism actions, and has few performance indicators, quantifiable targets or finite timelines.
How come many hundreds of personnel carrying weapons, some who almost certainly have committed crimes under international law, can enter Australia without Customs or security questioning, Humphrey McQueen asked in a speech outside Parliament House during the US President's visit? In truth, there's a wide range of Americans we would welcome to this country, historically or currently, but it doesn't include members of the Obama Gang, he told the audience.
"Security" is the new catch-all excuse for massive, over-the-top spending without having to prove value for money, or pass a cost-benefit analysis, says economics guru Saul Eslake. From manufacturing through food to electricity and water, "security" has become the password for avoiding rigorous, independent, arms length scrutiny.
The USA is twisting time and reality – and torturing its own legal system – in trying to prosecute a man, Nashiri, before a military commission for a "war crime". The Saudi allegedly masterminded the bomb attack on the USS Cole warship in a Yemeni port in October 2000, which killed 17 Americans. He has been held for a decade, half of it in secret CIA prisons around the world, before finally being charged.
Photographers are some of those people most affected day-to-day by terrorism law restrictions. Here's a short film from the UK – 'Stand Your Ground' – which explores what happens when six photographers take to the streets of the City of London. Photographers in Australia face similar problems in going about their work and hobbies: try taking a photo in your city and see what happens.
Phone data access being used to enforce fines
Police and crime agencies tapped people's phones and electronic equipment at the rate of about 10 a day last year – 3488 warrants were issued – while nearly 600 surveillance devices (10 a week) went into operation around Australia. Surveillance is on the rise, and privileged access to phone data is also increasingly being used for mundane activities such as collecting council fines and enforcing the dog act, via RSPCAs.
To tell fibs in government, everyone needs a good memory...and to stick to the same tall tales. Here's an example of how the Attorney-General's Department and ASIO got their fishing lines crossed, and the Greens' Senator Penny Wright reeled them in hook, line and sinker during Estimates hearings in Canberra.
::Next >>
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | © Civil Liberties Australia A04043 - ABN 46 368 619 567 |