CLA
Civil Liberties Australia
- Printed on Thursday 24 May 2012 from http://www.cla.asn.au/0805/index.php/terrorism/articles/snap-restrictive-laws-snare-photographers
CLA's policy on terrorism
CLA believes so-called terrorism acts are always criminal offences, and should be so treated. All measures to counter terrorism should conform with international human rights standards, conventions and laws and the customary Australian rule of law.
Upcoming Events

twitter facebook  rss

Search our site
Translate
Terrorism

Print Friendly and PDF

1 comment


Comment made by: P Bowdidge [Visitor]
What really worries me is the sentence at the bottom of the second paragraph on Project Griffin's (integration of police and corporate security) website, that reads:

" It has also generated interest and acclaim overseas, particularly in the United States, Hong Kong and Australia."
http://www.projectgriffin.org.uk/

I've a terrible feeling as governments move to privatise as much as they can, we'll see a lot more corporate security performing traditional police roles. As poorly as police sometimes act, their govt run counterparts are often worse; the ignorant, overbearing behaviour of Transperth Transit Officers regarding photography is one such example. I see no reason why private security firms would have any better screening and training of their officers. Quite the opposite. Doesn't bode well.
Sat 05 Nov 2011 @ 11:31

 

Terms of Use Creative Commons | Privacy Policy | © Civil Liberties Australia A04043 - ABN 46 368 619 567