A law unto themselves, absent model principles

Bill Rowlings* questions how ‘professional’ is the Legal Profession Board of Tasmania. It’s a quango that only recently worked out it needs to abide by model litigant principles, a decade after it was created. And it seems to particularly dislike the right of people to question, scrutinise and dissent.

It is a body which annually seeks funding approval from the Attorney-General and reports formally to the AG each year, making it a quango despite its claims of “independence”. It has 10 statutory functions. Handling complaints is the third listed, but seems to dominate its activities overwhelmingly. Educating the public is one of its activities which appears to have received a very much lower priority.

The Child is Father of the Man

Considering the ‘Me Too’ campaign, it seems to me that the problems associated with it, in Australia anyway, require long- term solutions rather than expressions of anger.

Aged care: inquiry should focus on ‘people’ not ‘consumers’

Civil Liberties Australia has taken issue with the language used in a parliamentary inquiry into the Quality of Care in Residential Aged Care Facilities in Australia. “We note that the Terms of Reference refer to ‘residents’ and ‘consumer protection’, rather than referring to ‘people’, ‘older Australians’ or ‘citizens’. In this language lies the danger of treating older Australians merely as “profit units” for an industry portrayed in the public perception as ‘caring’, because of its links to churches and the like, but which is in truth as hard-nosed and bottom line-driven as any other, “ CLA has told the inquiry. Click for CLA’s submission

Aged care homes: strident report from SA

“The evidence establishes that, in theory, there were sufficient mechanisms in place to ensure appropriate oversight in relation to complaints and reports and the investigation of incidents. In practice however these systems failed because they depended too much upon individual reporting and individual judgement. As a result nearly all of the information about the poor standard of care at the Oakden Facility was confined to those who worked there.”  – quote from the report.

Who else is surveilling you?

Police have a national photo ID database – and then there’s ASIO – but who else has you under surveillance? Apparently, poker machine sites keep tight track on patrons and their habits.

March 2018 newsletter: FOI, privacy in turmoil as boss resigns out of the blue

The boss of privacy, data breach monitoring and FOI has resigned out of the blue, just as the government introduces a new regime supposedly to curtail leaking by the corporate sector of private, personal data. At the same time, the head of Australia’s police and security services, Minister Peter Dutton, has launched an overt, public attack on magistrates and the judiciary.

Other items in this issue include:

  • TPP-11 just as flawed as the original: sovereignty at risk
  • Have ASIO ‘blobs’ been given illegal access to Parliament House?
  • DPP’s office profits from proceeds of crime: more staff, more funding
  • First system of detention centre inspections under OPCAT is set up
  • Teenagers to get lesser rights…and women already suffer discrimination
  • State election is a high-stakes choice regarding human rights
  • Nation’s justice system is in turmoil, says its former head
  • Rulers crack down on lawyers’ rights, licences cancelled

DOWNLOAD HERE for SINGLE COLUMN (read on screen) or TWO COLUMN version (print, read over a break)

Motions for Discussion – eAGM 2018

In preparation for the 2018 electronic Annual General Meeting (eAGM) voting the following four motions are proposed by the Board for the consideration of members.  Discussion is open on these motions until 4 Mar 18.

CLA’s Policy – Genetics/DNA

Genetics and DNA issues need special consideration by the State. The best-possible protections should be enforced in legislation.  Read CLA Policy on Genetics and DNA

DFAT misses a chance to listen

What were once excellent consultations by DFAT with NGOs recently became one-way lectures, from DFAT, to the detriment of everybody. Let’s hope it reverts in style next meeting. 11  Feb 2018

Sending journos and ‘whistlers’ to jail

The federal government plans more draconian security legislation, even as the cabinet documents farce mocks its own rhetoric. These are more over-the-top laws we don’t need.