Civil Liberties Australiaspacer
Letter to Senator Xenophon: The article in the Age 161230 describes how whistleblower Brian Hood has had to sell his home because he could not gain further employment after becoming a whistleblower  about behaviour at the Reserve Bank.
He is one of many. It is utterly disgraceful that individuals who are so courageous as to risk everything, including jeopardising their future careers, are so poorly looked after. The article states that in Britain, the head of the Serious Fraud Office, David Green, says that financially rewarding whistleblowers ‘seems slightly distasteful’. (Presumably he has never had to contemplate anything to distasteful, himself.)  His view is contrasted with Mary Jo White, the outgoing chairwoman of the US Securities Exchange Commission, who sees “the advent of the US whistleblower reward and protection program in 2011 as a ‘game changer’ “.
I would advocate the American view, so that whistleblowers are regarded more as ‘quality control’ leaders in our society who do not so much have to fear persecution and financial catastrophe. (When it comes to police who are whistleblowers, I remember reading of one ex-policeman whistleblower about 15 years ago, saying that he would never be safe again.)
I urge you to do everything you can to persuade your whistleblower reform parliamentary committee of the need to protect and reward whistleblowers and to recommend it in their final report.
– Marigold Hayler (CLA member) Darley Vic
Copies sent to:  Malcolm Turnbull, Prime Minister of Australia; Barnaby Joyce, National Party of Australia; Bill Shorten, Australian Labor Party; Richard di Natale, Australian Greens Party
Print Friendly
Facebooktwittermailby feather

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Commenting ...our policy

We welcome comments, for alternative views and to generate debate. We check comments before they are published, to make sure they are on-topic, family-friendly and in keeping with our publishing principles. To make sure your comments are published, please...

  • stay on topic
  • leave out swear words and bad language
  • be careful not to libel or defame any body
  • do not be -ist: (race, age, sex, etc)
  • avoid posting someone else's copyright material, and
  • concentrate on the factual more than the emotional (though there's room for both)
If your comments stray from these principles, they may not be posted, or may be edited to remove bits we find offending or inappropriate.

If you see something in a comment that you think is objectionable, please let us know your reasons.

We usually post comments at the bottom of articles, with a link off the Home page as well. But we may use them elsewhere, or as a separate article (we also reserve the right to not post them at all, at our sole discretion). See also our Terms of Use and Privacy policies links below.