Civil Liberties Australiaspacer

Sop to tax avoiders

 Posted by on 3 August 2016  Add comments
 

Negative gearing never became a big issue during the recent elections as Labor’s measures to combat this tax-avoidance pathway, by confining it to new homes, was limited by a “grandfather” clause. The clause allowed the continuation of arranged losses by investors on residential properties to offset the tax on their income derived from other, more profitable sources.

Negative gearing is dividing the nation. Billions of dollars are lost to the government annually by this crude tax-avoidance measure, first home buyers are outbid at auctions by investors encouraged by conservative governments to buy established homes for rental purposes. This enables governments to reduce public housing stock, adding to the long waiting time for potential tenants, many of whom cannot afford commercial rents.

Like an episode from past class-divided societies, wealth inheritance of property is growing rapidly, encouraged by governments pandering to a voter base of privileged tax avoiders.

Keith McEwan, CLA member, Bonython ACT

Print Friendly
Facebooktwittermailby feather

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


Commenting ...our policy

We welcome comments, for alternative views and to generate debate. We check comments before they are published, to make sure they are on-topic, family-friendly and in keeping with our publishing principles. To make sure your comments are published, please...

  • stay on topic
  • leave out swear words and bad language
  • be careful not to libel or defame any body
  • do not be -ist: (race, age, sex, etc)
  • avoid posting someone else's copyright material, and
  • concentrate on the factual more than the emotional (though there's room for both)
If your comments stray from these principles, they may not be posted, or may be edited to remove bits we find offending or inappropriate.

If you see something in a comment that you think is objectionable, please let us know your reasons.

We usually post comments at the bottom of articles, with a link off the Home page as well. But we may use them elsewhere, or as a separate article (we also reserve the right to not post them at all, at our sole discretion). See also our Terms of Use and Privacy policies links below.

(required)

(required)

Join