Academic Clive Hamilton argues (on ABC Online) for the pro-case for mandatory internet filtering. He admits he hasn’t researched one of his prime contentions – bad impact on teenage boys – because of "ethical considerations". The blog responses put mostly alternative views. The full ABC article (including blog comments) is available here.
One comment
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Based on this idiot’s (Clive Hamilton) logic, you’d have to ban most Hollywood blockbuster movies where physical harm is portrayed. Most porn portrays the exchange of pleasure between consenting adults.