Apps may come to dictate our future ‘freedom’

By Paul Gregoire*

In his COVID-19 update on 16 April 2020, prime minister Scott Morrison set out seven “precedent conditions” of a forward planning framework that if set in place could result in an easing of pandemic restrictions in four weeks’ time.

The fifth condition on the list is “advanced technology for contact tracing”.

This entails a downloadable phone app that can track people a user comes into contact with, and if any these contacts fall prey to the virus, that user will then be notified.

Modelled on a similar app being used in Singapore, the “tracing app” should be ready for rollout within a fortnight. And while participation in the contact monitoring scheme will be voluntary, it does require a 40% opt-in rate to be effective.

Using pre-existing Bluetooth technology, the app would store the anonymised details of all people an individual has come into contact with for at least 15 minutes. And if a person is subsequently notified that they’d been in close proximity to a COVID carrier, they wouldn’t be told who it was.

But, despite assurances that it will be voluntary and unidentified data, many privacy-minded individuals felt their hairs stand on end when they heard about the scheme. And this sensation was only compounded when they realised that Apple and Google are getting in on the action as well.

Habit-forming

Of course, we’re currently in the midst of a life-threatening pandemic, so it’s hardly likely the Liberal Nationals government would take this as an opportunity to enhance its controls over the general populace. Or is it?

Civil liberties advocates have warned for years that since 9/11, successive governments at both the federal and state level have passed dozens of pieces of counterterrorism legislation that have been slowly eroding the rights of all, regardless of which side of the law they sit on.

A quick perusal of some key bills reveals that getting its hands on our private data is of keen interest to government. Take our metadata. Since late 2015, telcos have been required to store it for a period of 2 years, while law enforcement and intelligence agencies can access it without a warrant.

The Coalition hasn’t stop there though. In 2018, Peter Dutton revealed his Assistance and Access Bill. It enhanced the government’s ability to reach inside citizens’ encrypted message boxes, so it can read what’s there without the hassle of coding.

Indeed, right before the coronavirus pandemic swept into town, the old home affairs minister was making another broad general reach, this time spruiking his on-again, off-again proposal to turn the nation’s foreign cyber spying agency – the ASD – upon domestic targets.

A built-in function

Not wanting to be left out in the cold by Asian tech-heads, the US goliaths Apple and Google announced on 10 April that they’re getting into bed in order to design their own COVID-19 monitoring app, which is going to operate in much the same way as its Singapore counterpart.

document issued by the two tech companies outlines that the app will not “collect personally identifiable information or user location”, the list of contacts will never leave an individual’s device, and it will only be used by “public health authorities for COVID-19 pandemic management”.

“The problem is that the Google-Apple unholy alliance’s proposed ‘solution’ is not yet well or adequately defined,” said Civil Liberties Australia (CLA) CEO Bill Rowlings. “And each company has been guilty of privacy invasions in the past.”

“Provided their solution during the pandemic panic is temporary, a voluntary solution that a device owner could choose to install or not, and it is designed so that it automatically removes itself when the emergency is over, it may be acceptable,” Rowlings suggested.

However, the Apple-Google development team is hoping to eventually incorporate this functionality into their operating systems, so they can bypass the need to have it downloaded. And this could take months to do, which raises questions around why to proceed if the scheme is solely for COVID-19.

So, what’s it matter, anyway?

Many questioned what the issue was around having our metadata accessible to authorities prior to its required storage, as it doesn’t entail message content. Metadata is the date and time of calls, texts, emails, and internet sessions, as well as details of those being communicated with.

But, experts state that quite a profile can be built up about an individual via their metadata. It can reveal who they associate with, what their political persuasions are, their health status, details about familial relations and their financial situation.

So, back to the tracing app, one might question what could be done with a list of anonymous contacts on a device. However, there’s always the possibility of re-identifying data, which could then reveal contacts outside of digital communications, which metadata fails to do.

Time to take it back

Rowlings warns that while there’s the very real danger of around 1% of people dying as a result of the virus, there’s the equally legitimate issue that 100% of the population is in danger of having its privacy invaded and civil liberties lost on a permanent basis after the pandemic.

That is if “we citizens don’t insist our politicians and police wind back the emergency intrusions,” he told Sydney Criminal Lawyers.

The former journalist pointed to a range of restrictions that a few weeks ago wouldn’t have been conceivable: bans on beaches and playing golf, threats of huge fines, drones monitoring compliance, as well as a stipulation to walk around the ACT’s Lake Burley Griffin in a clockwise direction.

“There’s a clear trend in just a few weeks of loss of liberties and choice, and pervasive intrusion into our freedoms,” Mr Rowlings said, “as well our parliaments being shut down, so our democracy is shot to pieces.”

“We have a major battle on our hands over the next year or so, just to return to what was the rights and liberties status quo very recently,” he concluded.

Paul Gregoire is a Sydney-based journalist and writer. He has a focus on human rights issues, encroachments on civil liberties, drug law reform, gender diversity and First Nations rights. Prior to Sydney Criminal Lawyers®, he wrote for VICE and was the news editor at Sydney’s City Hub. This article is reproduced by permission of the author and Sydney Criminal Lawyers.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

2 Comments

  1. Hi Rob

    Thank you for the insightful commentary. I am concerned also about the huge contractions and restrictions placed on our personal liberties. During this entire lockdown, as you rightly pointed out, hairdressers were allowed to trade, hundreds were in coles, Safeway, bunnings, Officeworks, pet stores etc. Thise of you with a simple sense of germ and infection theory will be well aware that a highly infectious disease would have had plenty of opportunity to spread through these businesses alone and should have led to much more widespread infection and higher mortality rates in the australian population. This has not happened. The fact that our “partial” lockdown is being attributed to the relative low spread of the disease in Australia is absurd. 96 deaths is tragic, but hardly evidence of a pandemic. I hope that others are also finding the current narrative illogical and beginning to piece together their own opinions on the available observations. I have been drawn to CLA as I am greatly alarmed at the scale and severity of restrictions to our personal freedoms and the lack of evidence to justify it. Data from foreign countries, WHO etc are difficult to trust and commentary on situations in other countries hard to verify. The situation in this country is clear – we were going into lockdown to prevent overwhelming hospitals – they are underwhelmed – but we are keeping social distancing, trading and travel restrictions etc despite no evidence of a highly infectious fatal disease – evidence : low infection rates with so many businesses still operating. We are waiting for a never before used/proven mRNA vaccine from a tech billionaire that is pushing for mandatory global vaccinations. The vaccine makes changes to your DNA to produced virus mimicking proteins. Meanwhile professional contact tracers are being employed in the US and Canadian police are entering people’s homes are taking them to hospital for forced testing if they were in contact with covid positive person. Ohh I almost forgot, a papaya and goat gave a covid positive test result in Tanzania. Am I the only one alarmed?

    Pk

    Pk
  2. The proposal by the Federal Government which, I understand is supported by the Federal Opposition, State and Territory Premiers and Chief Ministers, to introduce an app which allows the tracking of the movement of people who have had or have Covid19 must be strongly opposed by all Citizens. We all know that our politicians will lie and dissemble at every opportunity. We are being told that this app will only be used during this pandemic. But can we trust the current, or future, Government not to use it to spy and control us? Of course we cannot do so. They will use this and coerce State & Territory Police into using it against law-abiding, private citizens. In light of the politically motivated raid by the Australian Federal Police of the ABC and some journalists employed by News Ltd, we can be sure that the AFP won’t need any coercing – it was probably their, or some Australian Spy agency’s, idea in the first place.
    I do not doubt that the so-called “social distancing” etc. are necessary – yet the Federal Government allows Hairdressers to operate – they are in ultra-close physical contact with their customers – they run their hands through people’s hair, touch their faces and most certainly cannot observe the “social distancing” of 1.5metres. Make one wonder who within the Government etc. have family members who own Hairdressing Salons and Barber Shops!
    The Government has said that people will have to install this Spyware App, but id that true? The Government, Without our permission/approval, can – as they have done during this Covid19 Pandemic – send as many text messages to our mobile phones so what is to stop them also getting the IT personnel within the AFP or other Spy Agencies from developing systems by which they can – again Without our Permission/Approval from simply installing this Spy Ware App on our phones without it actually also installing the icon so that we are 100% unaware that it is there?
    This app will inevitably be misused by Politicians, Police, ASIO, Australian Signals and, in all probability, Foreign governments and agencies.

    Robert McCormick

Leave a Reply

We are glad you have chosen to leave a comment on this article. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated according to our terms of use policy.