Civil Liberties Australiaspacer

Law and order issues for WA

 Posted by on 10 December 2016  Add comments
 

The WA state election is coming up in March. While the economy seems to lurch from bad to worse, it’s not the only issue that needs urgently to be addressed before we go to the polls.

From my perspective, the law and justice arena needs to be a focal point. So what would my wish list be for the new parliament? It’s hard to know where to start, but perhaps I can narrow it down to my top eight.

Photo show the WA Legislative Assembly.

Photo show the WA Legislative Assembly.

Note: The 2017 Western Australian state election will be held on Saturday 11 March 2017 to elect 59 members to the Legislative Assembly and 36 members to the Legislative Council.

  1. Mandatory Sentencing: This has done almost nothing to reduce the incidence of crime in any of the various areas where it has been implemented. If you must have imprisonment as a starting point (rather than a last resort) for any particular crime, then you need to give courts the power not to do it where it would be plainly unjust. Currently, they don’t have that option under mandatory sentencing laws. This needs to change as a matter of urgency.
  2. Assets Confiscation: For nearly 15 years we in WA have had the most draconian laws in the nation governing the seizure of assets from persons convicted of drug offences. Apart from doing nothing to fix the drug problem, these laws have led to well-documented cases where legitimately obtained property is confiscated and innocent third parties disadvantaged.
  3. Drug ‘Traffickers’: We need to reassess the deeming provisions in the Misuse of Drugs Act. At the moment, anyone who has in their possession 2g of meth at even 1% purity is deemed to be a “trafficker”. The same applies to heroin and cocaine. This Act was drawn up in 1981. In those days, no one used these drugs to anything like the same extent or at the same purity as they do today.

It was arguable back then that someone who had 2g in their possession might be a dealer. These days, 2g would be unlikely to get a serious addict through the day. A reassessment of this redundant 35-year-old law wreaking havoc in the courts should be a major priority.

  1. One-punch Homicides: The so-called “one punch” homicide law was introduced in WA back in 2008 but there’s no evidence to suggest that it has had any effect on the rate at which people under the effect of drugs and alcohol attack and kill each other at pubs and nightclubs. The strict operation of the section has seen some clearly unjust outcomes where the death of the victim was never intended, foreseen or even reasonably foreseeable. The wording of the law excludes any defence of accident. It needs to be amended to allow for acquittals in cases where death is genuinely accidental.
  2. Judge-alone Trials: Trial by judge alone in WA continues to be allowed only where the accused person is able to persuade a court that trial by jury would carry significant risks or is otherwise inappropriate. If an accused person wants to forego their right to trial by jury, for whatever reason, they should be able to do so. It’s cheaper and more efficient.
  3. Fresh Evidence: Where fresh evidence emerges that tends to prove a person’s innocence, that person should be allowed an appeal to have their conviction overturned. In WA there is no such entitlement. Whether or not there is sufficient fresh evidence to allow the matter to go back to court should also be determined by a judge rather than the Attorney-General.
  4. Costs on Acquittal: A criminal trial in WA continues to be a ruinously expensive process. Over the past few years we have seen people who have been acquitted after trial but who have suffered a massive financial cost in the process. If the prosecution decides to put you on trial, and loses, then it should pay your costs.
  5. Delay: It’s an old saying that justice delayed is justice denied. The inordinate delay in matters getting to trial in the criminal courts in WA is alarming and getting worse. The next government needs to commit significant additional funding to ensure adequate numbers of judges and magistrates are appointed. Extra resources are also required by the Coroner’s Court to avoid the current two-year wait for an inquest.

The problem with any of these issues gaining traction is the proponent would inevitably (but incorrectly) be castigated as being “soft on crime”.

And while the law and justice “toughness auction” continues to triumph over common sense, I won’t be holding my breath to see any of these changes in the term of the next Government, irrespective of who wins.

Tom Percy is a Perth QC and can be heard on 6IX at 7.40am on Thursdays. This article appeared first on Perth Now.

Print Friendly
Facebooktwittermailby feather

  One Response to “Law and order issues for WA”

  1. Spot on Tom. We need to form a dedicated Pressure Group in WA to demand these changes. I have been searching for 10 years for anybody prepared to lead such a group. Will you please?
    WA is by far the most reactionary state in Australia. It’s politicians’ lack of moral fibre is reflected in WA’s internationally embarrassing treatment of its Aboriginal Peoples. No amount of shameful publicity and no existing group with a social conscience has been able to dent the injustices wrought by police and WA’s Legal fraternity so far. Why? What is it going to take? We are a Hate State. Why are locals proud of this?

    I personally feel committed to tackling your List. So far, the allegiances I have sought with politicians and political groups in WA have come to nothing. Personal ambition is all I find. I am getting old. My young are new to WA and struggling to find jobs. They have experienced brutality from WA police which was dismissed callously.

    A Civil Liberties group in Western Australia, guided by the existing CLA in Canberra is what is needed. I’m on board. Let’s meet. Please email me.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


Commenting ...our policy

We welcome comments, for alternative views and to generate debate. We check comments before they are published, to make sure they are on-topic, family-friendly and in keeping with our publishing principles. To make sure your comments are published, please...

  • stay on topic
  • leave out swear words and bad language
  • be careful not to libel or defame any body
  • do not be -ist: (race, age, sex, etc)
  • avoid posting someone else's copyright material, and
  • concentrate on the factual more than the emotional (though there's room for both)
If your comments stray from these principles, they may not be posted, or may be edited to remove bits we find offending or inappropriate.

If you see something in a comment that you think is objectionable, please let us know your reasons.

We usually post comments at the bottom of articles, with a link off the Home page as well. But we may use them elsewhere, or as a separate article (we also reserve the right to not post them at all, at our sole discretion). See also our Terms of Use and Privacy policies links below.

(required)

(required)

Join